At Agincourt, English Archers wiped out the cream of French knighthood with their longbow arrows. At the Pope and Young museum in Chatfield, Minnesota, I saw the history of American archery displayed very vividly. And in Email hoaxes I’ve noted that a picture of a huge dead mountain lion had been claimed to prove that the animal had been killed by a bow hunter in at least fifteen states. The message being on the unreliability of such so called email “proofs.” It is with some trepidation that I now share with you an email message on the subject of the battle of Agincourt and it impact on us over 600 years later!
"I never knew this before, and now that I know it, I
feel compelled to send it on to my more intelligent friends in the hope that
they, too, will feel edified. Before the Battle of Agincourt in 1415, the
French, anticipating victory over the English, proposed to cut off the middle
finger of all captured English soldiers. Without the middle finger it would be
impossible to draw the renowned English longbow and therefore they would be
incapable of fighting in the future. This famous English longbow was made of
the native English Yew tree, and the act of drawing the longbow was known as
'plucking the yew' (or 'pluck yew'). Much to the bewilderment of the French,
the English won a major upset and began mocking the French by waving their
middle fingers at the defeated French, saying, See, we can still pluck yew! Since
'pluck yew' is rather difficult to say, the difficult consonant cluster at the beginning
has gradually changed to a labiodentals fricative F', and thus the words often used
in conjunction with the one-finger-salute! It is also because of the pheasant
feathers on the arrows used with the longbow that the symbolic gesture is known
as 'giving the bird’.
Of course, another version of this story is that Winston Churchill, a world renowned historian, knew well that it took two fingers to draw the English longbow. Thus he used a more accurate symbol. The one that came to stand for victory….
Haha! Wonderful story. I almost believe it. Thanks for the laugh.
ReplyDeleteHahahaha! You sure had me smiling at this one. You sure made my day. :-)
ReplyDeleteWhy, TB... you made me giggle. Had no idea this is where that was headed!
ReplyDeleteI can't believe how much I have learned from the social studies teacher! I loved this one but suspect your class never got to hear it.
ReplyDeleteThey never did!
DeleteOh I enjoyed that one..thanks! :)
ReplyDeleteHi There, I truly had forgotten where the 'giving the bird' sign came from... I did remember the Churchill 'victory' sign... Thanks for the history lesson. Quite interesting this morning!
ReplyDeleteHappy Advent to you.
Betsy
Thanks for the smiles I had while reading the email history you shared. Who knew history could be so enlightening and entertaining? Actually, I think I like the Churchill version better.
ReplyDeleteI used Agincourt teaching history at Cal as an example of the effect of new military techniques and strategies upon old technology, along with the machine gun in WW1.
ReplyDeleteNice posting.
Oh MY! I haven't seen this in years! And it is so good - and, well, believable, almost!
ReplyDeleteThanks for the chuckle this morning.
BTW, your swans are here.
Thanks, I love stuff like this. By the way, the use of the yew tree for bows goes way back to the Celts. Jack Whyte goes on about it In his historical series on the Arthurian legends. The slow growing yew was declared sacred as a way to protect it.
ReplyDeleteAnd I'm just starting a new Winnie book. Small world; it all goes around.
ReplyDeleteActually, the English often use a two finger salute instead of one, for the same reason. As the French sailed away, they held up both fingers. At least this is how I heard it.
ReplyDelete:) Thanks
ReplyDeleteHeh heh! Thanks for the pluckle, I mean, chuckle. ;-)
ReplyDeleteInteresting. Once my husband used a bow and arrow to hunt deer (back in the mid 60's) but he found it was far different than shooting at a target … he just couldn't do it and I was so glad !
ReplyDelete